How to judge Ego Eimi when you cannot read the code.
We do not post star ratings or invented testimonials. The few named quotes we show are already public in a case study, each linked so you can verify it. On request, we also connect you with callable references under NDA. We put two guarantees in writing. You own the repo, code, and IP from day one. And the case studies show outcomes in plain business terms. Software is a credence good, so judge us by signals you can verify, not adjectives on a review page.
01 / Is Ego Eimi worth it
Ego Eimi is worth it if you need software tied to revenue, delivery, or a deal, and you have no tech team to judge the work. You verify us before you commit: callable references on request, two written guarantees, code you own from day one, and case-study outcomes stated as business results. If any of those cannot be shown, that is your answer.
A non-technical founder cannot inspect a codebase, so a page full of five-star quotes proves nothing. Anyone can write them. What is harder to fake is a reference who will pick up the phone, a guarantee that costs us money when we miss, and an ownership arrangement that lets you walk with the work at any time. Those are the signals that survive contact with reality, so those are the ones we lead with. See the two guarantees in writing.
What we will not do on this page
- Invent testimonials, quotes, or names. If a name is not already public in a case study, it is not here.
- Post a star rating for Ego Eimi. We have not collected verified public reviews yet, and we will not fabricate them.
- Promise the market will love your product. We remove technical and ROI uncertainty, and business risk stays yours.
02 / How to verify a studio you cannot judge on code
Verify by signal, not by vibe.
Here is the check a careful buyer runs on any software partner, the signal to look for, and where we show it. Run it on us, and run it on everyone else you shortlist.
| How to verify a studio | The signal to trust | Where we show it |
|---|---|---|
| Ask to speak to a past client | A callable reference, given without stalling | On request under NDA, matched to your situation |
| Ask what happens if the work misses | A written remedy that costs them money, not a shrug | Delivery Guarantee: free remediation against signed criteria |
| Ask who owns the code and accounts | Client owns everything from day one, no lock-in | How we build: repo, infra, and IP in your accounts |
| Ask who is really accountable | One named senior, not a rotating cast of juniors | About: Felipe stays accountable end to end |
| Ask for outcomes, not adjectives | Business results you can restate: kept, shipped, passed | Case studies with attributed metrics |
| Ask where they say no | Honest limits and a willingness to decline a bad fit | When not to build |
Any studio worth hiring can answer all six. Start with a software audit or start a conversation.
03 / Callable references
On request, we connect you with a client who will take your call, under NDA, matched to a build like yours.
We do not publish names or quotes clients did not agree to make public, and we will not pretend otherwise. What we do instead is more useful when you are about to spend real money. When you are seriously evaluating an engagement, ask, and we will put you in touch with a reference whose situation looks like yours: a similar system, a similar risk, a similar lack of an internal tech team. You ask them the questions you cannot ask us.
How the reference call works
- You reach the point of a real decision, and you ask for a reference. We do not lead with names before then, out of respect for our clients.
- We match by situation, not by who is happiest to talk. If your build is a rescue, you speak to a rescue. If it is a fresh build, you speak to a fresh build.
- The call happens under NDA both ways, so the client can be candid about what went well and what was hard.
- We do not sit in on it. The point is a straight answer, not a supervised testimonial.
If a studio cannot produce a single client willing to do this, treat that as the review. Ask us for a reference when you are ready to decide.
04 / The trust we put in writing
Four things we stake, not say.
A review tells you how a job went for someone else. These four tell you what we are willing to lose if a job goes wrong for you. They are verifiable before you commit.
-
01
Two written guarantees that cost us money when we miss.
- Value Guarantee on the audit: at least 10x the fee in value you agree is real, or it is free, for pre-screened fits.
- Delivery Guarantee on the build: free remediation against acceptance criteria you sign, capped at around six weeks.
- Both are in writing before any work starts, so nobody argues later about what finished meant.
-
02
Day-one ownership you can inspect from the first commit.
- You own the repository, source code, infrastructure, docs, prompts, evals, and deployment from day one.
- The work lives in your accounts, so you can hand it to another team at any time and we lose our hold on you.
- That is the strongest signal there is: we have to earn the next stage instead of trapping you in it.
-
03
One accountable human, named, not a subcontract chain.
- Felipe owns the result end to end and is the person you call when something is wrong.
- No hidden juniors, no subcontract roulette, no getting ghosted after the invoice clears.
- You can read who that is on the about page before you sign anything.
-
04
Honesty about the limits, including the fits we turn down.
- We say audit-ready, and we mean it against a named framework. We build to standard and never claim the work is beyond attack.
- We do not guarantee the market. Customers, pricing, and timing stay your call and your risk.
- A short qualification gate sits before every engagement, and sometimes the honest answer is no.
05 / On the record
The quotes we can actually show.
We add nothing here that is not already public in a case study. These are named, and each one links to the build so you can verify it yourself.
Marco M., Founder, Cognum
"Felipe's strategy, innovation, and flawless execution propelled our growth in record time. His ability to turn bold ideas into reliable product is exceptional."
Verify in the case studyMatthew, Founder, Shoperator.ai
"Shoperator's at $50K MRR this month and we're aiming for $1M+ ARR this year. A lot of that is the infra and AI work you've been owning."
Verify in the case studyPadSquad, early-adopter agency
On VEYLAN, PadSquad reports 70% lower campaign cost and campaigns running 10x faster, work that used to take weeks now landing in minutes.
Verify in the case studyWant a reference matched to your situation, not just what is public? Ask for a callable reference when you are ready to decide.
06 / Outcomes in business terms
The best review is a business result you can restate in one sentence: kept the account, shipped on the date, passed the check.
Below are outcomes from real builds, in the client's business terms and attributed to the client's own reporting. We keep them conservative on purpose. Inflated numbers are the fastest way to lose the trust of a buyer who has been burned, and getting them wrong would defeat the point of this page.
What the work really did
- HYSS is the platform an AV and live-events company now runs its crew on, booking, scheduling, and paying freelancers with automatic conflict detection and live call sheets. No off-the-shelf tool did that.
- An AI code-review SaaS cut audit turnaround from seven-plus days to about four minutes, a change the client can measure directly.
- A CRM and RevOps automation handed an agency back about two days a week of work that used to be manual.
- A claim-eligibility assistant lifted the client's customers by 50%, on their reported figures.
Why the quality matters: 45% of AI-generated code ships with at least one OWASP Top-10 vulnerability (Veracode, 2025), so a system that only runs is not the same as one that holds up under review. Technology findings routinely adjust valuations by 3 to 12% of enterprise value in $2M to $20M-revenue deals, which is why a system that passes scrutiny is worth more than one that merely works today. See the full set across fintech, healthcare, and operations in the case studies.
07 / Who we are not for
The most honest review a studio can give you is a clear list of who it is wrong for.
We would rather tell you no now than take money we cannot stand behind. If you are one of the people below, we are probably not your best option, and a good reference call would tell you the same.
- ✓You want the cheapest possible hourly rate. We sell fixed-price certainty, and the lowest number is not the goal.
- ✓A simple, stable internal form or dashboard would do. Then no-code is likely right, and we will say so.
- ✓You want a partner who guarantees market success. No honest builder can promise how customers will respond.
- ✓You want to hand off a blank brief and check back in three months. We work closely, with signed criteria at each stage.
- ✓You are not yet post-revenue and the software is not tied to how the business runs or sells. Wait until it is.
Not sure you should build at all? Read when not to build custom software, then start a conversation.
08 / Common questions
Where can I read Ego Eimi reviews?
We do not run a page of star ratings or invented quotes, because a non-technical buyer cannot verify code and a five-star wall proves nothing. Instead we offer callable references on request, matched to a build like yours and taken under NDA, plus two written guarantees and case studies with attributed outcomes. If any studio cannot produce a client willing to take your call, treat that silence as the review.
Is Ego Eimi worth it?
It is worth it if your software is tied to revenue, delivery, or a deal and you have no tech team to judge the work. You verify that before committing: a callable reference, two guarantees that cost us money if we miss, code you own from day one, and outcomes stated as business results. It is not worth it if a simple no-code tool would do, or you want the cheapest hourly rate. Read when not to build.
Can I speak to a past client before I hire you?
Yes. When you reach a real decision, ask, and we connect you with a reference whose situation looks like yours: a similar system, a similar risk, and no internal tech team. The call happens under NDA both ways so the client can be candid, and we do not sit in on it. We do not publish names or quotes clients have not agreed to make public, which is why references come on request rather than as a wall of testimonials.
Why don't you run a wall of testimonials or star ratings?
Because anyone can write a wall of them, and a burned buyer knows it. The few quotes we do show are already public in a case study, and each links to the build so you can verify it. We will not fabricate reviews, or post names or quotes a client has not made public. What is harder to fake, and more useful when you are spending real money, is a reference who takes your call, a guarantee that costs us money when we miss, and code you own from day one.
How do I know your case-study numbers are real?
Every figure is attributed to the client's own reporting and kept conservative on purpose. We say four minutes, not instant, and about two days a week, not a transformed business. Inflated numbers are the fastest way to lose a buyer who has been burned. If a metric matters to your decision, ask on a reference call and hear it from the client directly rather than taking our word for it. You can see the full set in the case studies.
Who is Ego Eimi not a good fit for?
We are not for you if a simple, stable internal tool would do, if you want the cheapest hourly rate over fixed-price certainty, or if you expect a guarantee of market success. We build to standard and make the work audit-ready against a named framework, and business risk stays yours. If the software is not yet tied to how your business runs or sells, wait. Saying no is part of how the guarantees stay real.
Last updated July 2026 · Talk with Felipe
Your build
Taking on new builds
Have something in mind?
Tell us what you're making. We reply within a day with a fixed price and a date.